We have a very important fundamental choice before us today. To what degree do we trust the citizens of Wisconsin to make their own decision about welfare reform and to what degree do we think that Wisconsin's plan needs to be modified, changed, stapled, amended, or put through a blender by Washington bureaucrats? Here is the fundamental point. The plan passed in the Wisconsin legislature 73 to 25, an essentially two-thirds majority in the State assembly. Republicans and Democrats. All Republicans and a majority of Democrats. The Wisconsin State Senate? Seventy-five percent of people in the Wisconsin State Senate voted for the plan; 27 yes, 6 no. Three-quarters Republicans and Democrats were for what President Clinton called Wisconsin's bold welfare experiment.
Scott Klug: “We have a very important fundamental choice before us today. To what degree do we trust the citizens of Wisconsin to…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing Wisconsin's welfare reform plan and its bipartisan support during a floor speech.
Share
More from Scott Klug
Given the size and availability of U.S. coal reserves, the security of the domestic coal supply and the comparative economics of coal as a fuel, free market forces are operating to select and commercialize the most efficient and…
My empathy goes out to the taxpayers of America who continue to fund an organization that I think largely is out of date... it does not call for a continual support of the GPO. It essentially says that GPO has an even tougher job in the…
The final vote on W-2 presented legislators a choice. We could continue along a seemingly endless path that had fostered impoverished dependency on government aid. Or we could try a new direction in the hope of leading all Wisconsin…
In the substitute that has been offered by our colleague from Wisconsin, the language says 'urge.' Is it the gentleman's reading that it does not compel the Secretary to act by August?





