The fact that our largest Federal department with nearly a $700 billion budget still cannot comply with the law after several decades is a failure that rests squarely on us, the Congress.
Ron Johnson
The Public Record
Ron Harold Johnson is an American businessman and politician currently serving as the junior United States senator from Wisconsin, a position he has held since January 3, 2011. A member of the Republican Party, Johnson has focused on issues such as fiscal responsibility, healthcare reform, and government accountability during his tenure in the Senate. He has been an outspoken advocate for reducing the federal deficit and has often emphasized the need for economic growth through private sector initiatives.
Again, I understand. The accounting department is going to have to account for it in some way.
Get off of this idea that we are not going to conduct an audit until we know we are going to have a clean audit, and instead, use an audit as a real management tool, which is what it really should be.
We need to work hard with the Congress and the President to make sure it does not.
Is part of the problem there because as those systems are systemwide and they become massive, it becomes pretty difficult to get your arms around that?
I do not see how spending money on an audit to determine how bad you really are is a waste of money.
I am pleased to recommend to the Senate James D. Peterson to be the U.S. district judge for the Western District of Wisconsin. Jim has deep roots in Wisconsin, having earned a bachelor's, master's, and Ph.D. from the University of…
It says that not a single person has joined the Army National Guard as a result of the $136 million spent sponsoring race legend, Dale Earnhardt, Jr. over the last 5 years of recruiting new members.
To me, this is gobbledygook and what you need to be looking at is pretty basic in terms of measurement of effectiveness.
Is the Administration at all, considering--I realize Keystone XL Pipeline is a different issue--but are we considering other pipelines to take some of the burden off the rail system?
The economic approach is going to fail. So that is what I am saying. When the economic approach fails, then what do we do?





