But the point is here that if we take away the mechanism that has been set up in this bill, we will have eliminated all of the incentives we created to settle cases, all of the incentives we have created to not bring frivolous, fraudulent, or nonmeritorious lawsuits in U.S. district court. The compromise that we have come up with as changed from the original bill is a very, very good effort to control the overload of lawsuits in our courts without having to go back to a system now where there is no pressure on some individuals not to be responsible when they decide to bring an action in court. I strongly urge the defeat of this motion to recommit.
Bob Goodlatte: “But the point is here that if we take away the mechanism that has been set up in this bill, we will have eliminated all…”
On the recordMarch 7, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill related to lawsuit incentives and urging the defeat of a motion to recommit.
Share
More from Bob Goodlatte
Jul 18, 2022
I think the PATRIOT Act went off track in not defining some of the areas that set parameters around government gathering data.
Jul 18, 2022
The more opportunities that the consumer has to decide for themselves whether or not they want to make certain information available to Google or other companies and control how Google might utilize that information, the better.
Jul 18, 2022
Right, but the sale of the information to the government puts the government in the picture as well and the Fourth Amendment is directed at the government not obtaining information without showing probable cause, without providing a…





