I think there are a number of circumstances, particularly when civil rights, religious organizations, political campaigns, and other important things are being involved in surveillance, that there ought to be somebody not representing the target of the investigation, but somebody representing the public's interest in protection against unlawful searches and seizures.
Bob Goodlatte: “I think there are a number of circumstances, particularly when civil rights, religious organizations, political…”
On the recordJuly 18, 2022
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Goodlatte advocates for public interest representation in surveillance matters.
Share
More from Bob Goodlatte
Jul 18, 2022
The fact of the matter is this Committee has jurisdiction over this narrower focus regarding protecting the Fourth Amendment.
Jul 18, 2022
Right, but the sale of the information to the government puts the government in the picture as well and the Fourth Amendment is directed at the government not obtaining information without showing probable cause, without providing a…
Jul 18, 2022
I would call attention to something we haven't talked much about here today, and that is the fact that, when the FISA court issues warrants allowing for the surveillance of various parties that are brought to the attention of the court…





