The reason that is in there is to limit the exposure of parties that may be lower-income parties because the converse is true as well. If the defendant prevails, the plaintiff cannot pay any more than he pays himself.
Discussing provisions related to legal exposure for lower-income parties.
Share
More from Bob Goodlatte
I think there are a number of circumstances, particularly when civil rights, religious organizations, political campaigns, and other important things are being involved in surveillance, that there ought to be somebody not representing the…
I would call attention to something we haven't talked much about here today, and that is the fact that, when the FISA court issues warrants allowing for the surveillance of various parties that are brought to the attention of the court…
I think that antitrust laws definitely should be utilized to promote competition.
Other voices in this conversation
