The one word answer is yes, and that is certainly my intention in offering this amendment to make sure that the underlying purpose of the bill is preserved, but make sure that, A, there are no efforts here to create new taxes or new regulations of Internet activities, and, B, that there is no unconstitutionally, and I think that is an important word we use here, unconstitutionally discriminatory action taken by a State that would disfavor out-of-State purveyors of these products.
Bob Goodlatte: “The one word answer is yes, and that is certainly my intention in offering this amendment to make sure that the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to taxation and regulation of Internet activities.
Share
More from Bob Goodlatte
I think the PATRIOT Act went off track in not defining some of the areas that set parameters around government gathering data.
The more opportunities that the consumer has to decide for themselves whether or not they want to make certain information available to Google or other companies and control how Google might utilize that information, the better.
I would call attention to something we haven't talked much about here today, and that is the fact that, when the FISA court issues warrants allowing for the surveillance of various parties that are brought to the attention of the court…
I think a great first step would be to pass the Fourth Amendment's Not For Sale Act that's been introduced by Chair Nadler.





