John Ratcliffe

I urge my colleagues to oppose this amendment. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from New York (Mr. Meeks). The question was taken; and the Acting Chair…

Your answer not ruling employment with her means that as much of the free world is wondering whether or not Hillary Clinton should have been prosecuted and possibly sent to prison for being extremely careless, as the FBI director said…

I oppose the amendment. This is an amendment which carves out of the bill regulations issued by the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Mr. Chairman, there is no basis upon which to single out HUD as an agency to which courts…

The Chevron doctrine is the primary driver of regulatory overreach. It should be overturned. This bill would do that; so I oppose this amendment. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment…

If DHS can't handle basic promotion and marketing of its programs, then I have concerns about the likelihood of private-sector participation going forward.

I will again urge opposition to the amendment. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Johnson). The question was taken; and the Acting Chair…

I am curious to hear today what strategy is guiding this vitally important program for homeland security and what metrics are being used to measure the value it has brought to the owners and operators of critical infrastructure.

With all due respect, I'm not going to let you run out the clock on the American people that have questions that need to be answered.

I want to thank our panel of experts for joining us today so Congress can better understand the work being done in this area and the value of DHS's vulnerability assessments and training.

While I respect the gentlewoman's service and the spirit in which she offers this amendment, this amendment carves out of the bill national security regulations from the Department of Homeland Security. As we all know, Mr. Chair, the…

If you thought the meeting that you had on the tarmac with Bill Clinton cast a shadow over the integrity of the Department of Justice, what I've heard today from you made the size of that shadow--made the size of that shadow something that…

The amendment carves out of the bill regulations on lead and copper in drinking water. In so doing, it would preserve unelected bureaucrats' broad discretion to impose on the public overarching statutory and regulatory interpretations in…

Because your answer tells the American people that after the FBI Director told you that Ms. Clinton had been extremely careless with at least 110 emails marked as top secret, secret, or classified, and may have jeopardized the lives of…

I again urge opposition to the amendment. I yield back the balance of my time. The Acting CHAIR. The question is on the amendment offered by the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Johnson). The question was taken; and the Acting Chair announced…

this enormously consequential rule is exempt from the cost-benefit framework and OIRA review.

your response, Mr. Shelanski, about judges not having the expertise that some of these agencies have to make these decisions...

I think the work that this Subcommittee does is some of the most important work that we do here in Congress.

Unfortunately, that's not what's happening.

When regulations go wrong, which is what we see so often today, they can be impossible to comply with.

I can't remember the exact year that Al Gore invented the Internet, but I'm pretty sure it was after 1934.

It's painfully clear to me that so many of the burdensome regulations are inflicting real harm on individuals and families.

I thank the gentleman from Mississippi for cosponsoring this bill and for his leadership in this area. I, once again, urge my colleagues to support H.R. 5389. I yield back the balance of my time.

I once again urge all of my colleagues to support H.R. 5388, and I yield back the balance of my time.

The legislation was a major win for security and privacy, allowing companies to secure their networks.

If no one shares data, everyone is less secure and intrusions go undetected.