I think what Job Corps brings is hope for the future, a safe haven for students to achieve high school diplomas.
Joe Barton
The Public Record
Joe Barton is a former Republican member of the United States House of Representatives, representing Texas's 6th congressional district from 1985 to 2019. During his tenure, Barton served as the chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, where he played a significant role in shaping energy policy and telecommunications legislation. He was known for his advocacy of fossil fuel interests and his support for deregulation in the energy sector.
Many would be forced to return home to a home life with extreme challenges, no work, lack of skills, lack of education.
I can tell you that an initiative led by our national office of Job Corps -- it's called Youth to Youth.
I think what makes me proud, and possibly a lot of my colleagues, is making a difference in the lives of students.
You know, maybe that would be a better question for the Department of Labor.
Job Corps students both on and off center are 2.5 times less likely to commit suicide, four times less likely to die from a drug overdose, 15 times safer than their counterparts, 16 to 24 years old nationally.
My contention is that, inherent to American citizenship, is the right to have an opportunity, and that Job Corps creates opportunity for young people in circumstances wherein often that opportunity is too difficult to find.
We are going to need a lot more energy infrastructure in the next 20 to 30 years and pipelines are going to be a big part of that.
I think we are going to do a pipeline permitting reform bill and we would really like your agency's input.
If we are going to do a pipeline reform bill is there any reason we couldn't use the same regulatory authority and permitting process for oil and gas pipelines?
Is there any real reason to do that other than that is the way we have always done it?
Well, a million years puts it beyond my tenure in this Congress. I mean, we are----
The staff brief--the majority staff brief for this hearing says that the Yucca Mountain site has passed all technical and safety reviews and has been found safe to store high-level nuclear waste for a million years. Is that correct?
I think the political opposition will occur if not in the host community, in the surrounding host communities and the transportation routes no matter where we put it.
For the first time, it will allow interim to have a chance to be certified as we look at the permanent repository.
In 1982, I was a White House fellow in the Department of Energy, and I played a very minor, minor role in the drafting of what we now call the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982.
Right. Well, I can't say that we are a total level playing field, there are people on these panels that disagree with that statement.
We always want to score a touchdown. Sometimes we take a field goal. What we don't want to do today is take a safety. Vote for this bill. Let's send it to the other body and continue to work to improve it. It is a good bill. Please vote…
The transparency needs to happen. It needs to happen not only so we can bring down drug prices, but the things that is going to bring down healthcare costs all together.
I am opposed when they are causing the public the distress that they are causing them by increasing drug prices the way that they are.
I am telling you, and that is what is happening with the PBMs. They are not achieving what they set out to achieve.





