Political Quotes

Jack Brooks: I rise in opposition to H.R. 4296, the so-called Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act. It is time…

On the recordMay 5, 1994
I rise in opposition to H.R. 4296, the so-called Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act. It is time we set the record straight and after doing so, vote down this misguided effort. If ever the name of a bill was misleading, this one is classic. H.R. 4296 does nothing to ensure public safety or recreational use of firearms. Rather, it places unnecessary, unjustified restrictions on the legitimate use of certain weapons. The sole purpose of this legislation is to ban certain semiautomatic weapons. ... under that line of reasoning, I am surprised that they are not just proposing to do away with the second amendment of the U.S. Constitution, for as a hunter and sportsman myself, I can assure each Member that any gun, even a dart gun or BB gun or 22 rifle is very intimidating when the barrel of that gun is pointed directly at you. Accessories found on some semiautomatic weapons ... may look menacing to persons unfamiliar with firearms, but there is no evidence that any one of them provides any advantage to the criminal.
Said by
Jack Brooks
Democratic · Texas

Editor's note · Context

Opposing H.R. 4296, the Public Safety and Recreational Firearms Use Protection Act.

Share

More from Jack Brooks

Apr 21, 1994

This motion makes the sixth time that the other side of the aisle has seen fit to try and derail through procedural tactics the toughest, most carefully structured crime bill to come out of the House in 20 years. The effort to stall…

govinfo.gov
Feb 10, 1994

The Attorney General said very clearly, and she uses English, American, you know, in her letters, said, `No such inherent conflict of interest exists in the investigation of Members of Congress.' In other words, you investigate the Members…

govinfo.gov
Apr 19, 1994

this is a hodgepodge of immigration provisions, some of which have some merit. But they should all be considered in the deliberative process of the Committee on the Judiciary. Everybody knows that. But some other provisions are downright…

govinfo.gov
Apr 19, 1994

in the final analysis, this amendment does not change the status quo. Leaving the status quo in place would allow a steady stream of postconviction habeas appeals to any number of courts. It also leaves intact perhaps the greatest problem…

govinfo.gov

Other voices in this conversation