This motion makes the sixth time that the other side of the aisle has seen fit to try and derail through procedural tactics the toughest, most carefully structured crime bill to come out of the House in 20 years. The effort to stall movement of the crime bill first began as an effort to try and defeat the rule at the very beginning of the debate, even though that rule permitted 68 amendments going to every major plank of the bill. The same negative effort was next seen in a series of unprecedented motions to rise and to 'strike after the enacting clause.' All went down to inglorious and appropriate defeat. At the end of the process, we now witness the latest reincarnation of their efforts to stop the crime bill with a motion to recommit with instructions. As we all know, the motion to recommit contains language that has already been voted down by this body. Yet the other side persisted in denying the truth recognized by all objective observers. The bill now poised to pass the House represents a breakthrough effort to achieve a balance between hard-nosed punishment and forward-looking prevention.
Jack Brooks: “This motion makes the sixth time that the other side of the aisle has seen fit to try and derail through procedural…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing procedural tactics against the crime bill during House debate.
Share
More from Jack Brooks
Mr. Chairman, in the interest of moving this legislation toward completion, I am at this time offering a second en block amendment consisting of six provisions made in order under the rule. They are the Beilenson-Berman-Condit-Thurman…
as I said earlier, the independent counsel statute is an important law and it should be reauthorized. However, the law which expired has not fulfilled its purpose due to shortcomings in the former statute. We need to reform this law if we…
I rise in strong opposition to the amendment offered by my friend, the gentleman from Florida [Mr. McCollum], and in strong support of the substitute offered by the gentleman from New Jersey [Mr. Hughes], the distinguished chairman of the…
Mr. Chairman, I rise in support of the amendment offered by the gentleman from New Jersey [Mr. Smith]. No crimes are more abhorrent than crimes involving child sexual abuse. Even the thought of such abuse of a child is repellent to every…





