In the past, there has not been any real concern about revising the master manual. The master manual was written by the Corps of Engineers in 1960. It has been the law of the land with regard to the operation of the river since that time, now 40 years. There has been an effort underway in earnest over the course of this last year to look for ways that more accurately reflect how the Missouri River ought to be managed, taking into account, now, the extraordinary relevance of fish and wildlife issues. Economically, the fish, wildlife and recreational benefits of the river now constitute over $80 million. Navigation constitutes $7 million. In economic wherewithal, that is what the reality is today: $7 million for navigation, over $80 million for fish, wildlife and recreation. Yet the master manual is written in a way that only recognizes the navigational issues because that is all there was in 1960 when this was written. The Corps is now looking for a way to provide better balance.
Thomas Daschle: “In the past, there has not been any real concern about revising the master manual. The master manual was written by the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need to revise the master manual for managing the Missouri River to include fish and wildlife considerations.
Share
More from Thomas Daschle
The American people, by survey after survey, say they want these tax loopholes closed when they are informed particularly of the loopholes which allow corporations to shift revenue to a tax haven.
Well, Senator Coburn, I believe that a top-down review is essential. I would start with that. I think it is very, very important for us to understand what the problems are before we try to make the system better.
It ought to be the choice of the disability community as to where they would like to get their care and to live their lives.
I think that the cost of the status quo, the cost of doing nothing may be the most expensive option of all.





