It’s something that, yeah, some of our members are paying attention to.

We’re going to fix this today, and restore the longtime Senate precedent of expeditious confirmation, and the Senate’s role as first and foremost a legislative body.

If they aren't willing to do that, then we'll proceed with the other plan.

It’s time to move. Time to quit stalling. Time to vote. Time to fix this place.

It's in their court.

We've got a crisis, and it's time to take steps to restore Senate precedent and codify in Senate rules what once was understood to be standard practice, and that is the Senate acting expeditiously on presidential nominations to allow a…

There’s a dispute about whether that’s really his signature, so it’s just going to be argued back and forth.

It’s time to take steps to restore Senate precedent and codify in Senate rules what once was understood to be standard practice — and that is the Senate acting expeditiously on presidential nominations to allow a president to get his team…

He’s got to take responsibility for, you know: We confirm these people. We go through a lot of work to get them confirmed. And they’re in office a month?

I hope that the process will continue in a bipartisan way as we move toward the September deadline.

There's certainly interest in looking at options that might enable us to break the logjam and expedite consideration of nominees in a way that, in the end, would benefit both parties when their party has the presidency.

At some point, we may need to look at doing things differently on nominees generally, if the Democrats continue this path of obstruction that they're on right now.