I think we can all learn something, probably from recent history, the FBI's interpretation of the Hunter Biden laptop as Russian disinformation.
We want to make sure that the United States is the clear winner, the clear innovator in all technology, including AI.
It gives them, basically, broad authority to do whatever.
I urge Congress to consider that we already have many proposals that have some bipartisan support.
How does this EO stifle innovation, limit potentially investments in AI in the United States?
I know Dr. Lee is going to disagree here. So why does it not, in your opinion, because to me it is so obvious.
Any movement on the DPA provisions of the EO?
the risk that we relinquish our current lead in AI to China, and that could have catastrophic implications for our milit...
Did Henry Zhao, a Chinese businessman, want assurances that Joe Biden would join the board?
Biden insists he didn't interact with biz partners
During one of these phone calls, did Hunter Biden tell Joe Biden that he and Henry Zhao needed help 'getting across the ...