In May of 1989, students began a protest for democratic reforms in Beijing's Tiananmen Square. Their movement began modestly, then swelled to thousands as they occupied the square in what they saw as a people's movement. From the flat stone of the square they erected a 10-foot-tall likeness of the world's most recognizable symbol of freedom, the Statue of Liberty. Threatened, divided, Beijing's hard-line leaders invoked martial law and ordered the army to the square. Huge throngs, possibly amounting to more than 1 million Chinese, took to the streets to defy martial law and block troops from their planned crackdown on China's young freedom fighters. The world saw gripping pictures of an unarmed man refusing to give way to an approaching tank. ``With the people behind us, we'll succeed,'' one student told a reporter. ``No government can survive by using the Army against its own citizens.'' Tragically, he was wrong. The New York Times reported the following scene on June 4, 1989: Tens of thousands of Chinese troops retook the center of the capital early this morning from pro-democracy protesters, killing scores of students and workers and wounding hundreds more as they fired submachine guns at crowds of people who tried to resist. The hard-line leaders gave personal attention to the students' Statue of Liberty. ``Push it down,'' they ordered.
Bob Inglis: “In May of 1989, students began a protest for democratic reforms in Beijing's Tiananmen Square. Their movement began…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Tiananmen Square protests and the violent crackdown by Chinese authorities.
Share
More from Bob Inglis
there's plenty of bad economic news around, and we've shared in some of that in the upstate of South Carolina. But there are also some real bright spots. One of them is on Garlington Road in Greenville, South Carolina, where General…
Climate changes is a cancer, and we don't cure cancer by refusing to test for it, calling the doctor a liar, and refusing to consider any treatment.
Mr. Chairman, I have had the opportunity now to sit here and listen to some of the comments of our colleagues... this Government is a drag on our economy. It is too big and needs to be reduced in size and scope. As the gentleman from South…
I sincerely hope that this Committee is not beginning and ending its record on climate science in the 112th Congress with this hearing.





