I rise in strong support of the Stenholm-Smith balanced budget amendment. I believe that the amendment is needed for two reasons: First of all, we need it for the necessary discipline to cause this House to do what we cannot seem to do on our own in the ordinary budget process. We need the discipline of a constitutional requirement of balancing the Federal Government's budget. That is the first reason. The second reason is that we need, frankly, to create a crisis by the passage of the balanced budget amendment. Make no mistake about it. As a member of the Committee on the Budget, I am well aware that passing the balanced budget amendment will create a crisis in our budgetary process, because it will mean that all of us will have to come to the table to figure out how to balance a budget that is terribly, terribly out of balance. That will require, that crisis will create an environment where we will come together, I believe, just as this country has come together before with other crises, where we have been faced with an outside threat. We will forget Republican and Democrat differences. We will come together at a table where we can figure out together how to balance the budget and do what we all know we need to do.
Bob Inglis: “I rise in strong support of the Stenholm-Smith balanced budget amendment. I believe that the amendment is needed for two…”
Editor's note · Context
Supporting the Stenholm-Smith balanced budget amendment during House floor debate.
Share
More from Bob Inglis
I rise today to say that setting deadlines for withdrawal from Iraq is unacceptable. I am in agreement with the concept of adding a series of success checkpoints, and I suggested as much in a letter to the President 2 weeks ago. It worked…
Mr. Speaker, we have a huge challenge in Iraq. It is a challenge for Democrats. It is a challenge for Republicans. It is a challenge for the President and for the Congress. We need an American solution to that challenge. The question…
I do think this does gut the bill. I think it guts it for the simple reason it strikes out three-quarters of the bill. It takes out the good faith exception that we tried to put in the bill. It is as simple as that. It is not that there is…
In May of 1989, students began a protest for democratic reforms in Beijing's Tiananmen Square. Their movement began modestly, then swelled to thousands as they occupied the square in what they saw as a people's movement. From the flat…





