I think that this bill has been totally misdescribed throughout the debate here. There are going to be far more people that have money, and have the ability to pay, that have to pay the other side's attorney's fees than will ever be able to be paid by these poor defendants that we keep talking about. I would surely much rather have an order for attorney's fees from some of the main corporations than I ever would someone that is as described in this bill. We do not have a copy of the letter that supposedly came from the Attorney General's office, but I suspect they do not, also, understand what is in this bill, because it just is not as described in the letter that was written and I hope that we can get a copy of that letter.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing concerns about the misrepresentation of a bill regarding attorney's fees.
Share
More from William Moorhead
I want to help people that cannot help themselves. But I can tell my colleagues, poor people are more apt to be the defendants than they are the plaintiffs. Rich people are more apt to be the plaintiffs than are the poor. I think this…
But it still says that those class of expenses if they would be manifestly unjust, there is an exception.
Senior U.S. District Judge Milton Shadur of the northern district of Illinois said he generally would welcome the restoration of the old rule. "The most recent changes watered it down," he says, "by offering an out for lawyers who get…
all I wanted to say is our committee does have a major responsibility. The Judicial Act of 1789 set up the Federal courts. Our committee, our Subcommittee on Courts, does have the responsibility of providing the judicial procedure that is…





