First if he is as broke and poor as you say, of course, I would not want a judgment against him because it would not be worth very much. But there is a provision in the law that we are promoting that says if it would be manifestly unjust, the court does not have to order those attorney's fees.
Discussing provisions in a law related to attorney's fees during a debate.
Share
More from William Moorhead
But actually it applies to both the defendant and the plaintiff. The plaintiff is not the only one that could be caught paying the other person's fees. But I can tell the gentleman that you can limit the amount of money you may have to pay…
I say to the gentleman, ``Primarily because, whey you cut from 100 percent to 25 percent, you're gutting the very issue we're talking about.''
This is an unconscionable tax on innovation, a tax on American inventors for seeking to share with the American public the results of their creativity. This amendment offered by the gentleman from West Virginia proposes to take another $34…
I understand that, and I did comment on that in my comments, that you come to another argument when you go into that. You lead to further litigation and dispute as to whether the offer has been reasonable or unreasonable, many other things…
Other voices in this conversation
