I make a point of order against the amendment because it proposes to change existing law and constitutes legislation in an appropriation bill and, therefore, violates clause 2 of rule XXI. The rule states in pertinent part: ``An amendment to a general appropriation bill shall not be in order if changing existing law.'' The amendment requires new determinations. I ask for a ruling from the Chair. The Acting CHAIR. Does any other Member wish to be heard on the point of order? If not, the Chair is prepared to rule. The Chair finds that this amendment includes language requiring a new determination. The amendment, therefore, constitutes legislation in violation of clause 2 of rule XXI. The point of order is sustained, and the amendment is not in order. {time} 2245 Amendment Offered by Mr. Gosar
Share
More from Tom Wolf
The international legal definition of the crime of genocide is found in article II of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide. It says: Genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in…
According to a new poll released by CNN last evening, ``Americans are increasingly concerned that ISIS represents a direct terror threat'' and that they are ``fearful that ISIS agents are living in the United States.'' A Washington Post…
I think the commonwealth -- we have been working on preventive measures to improve railway safety in general and that is something that we need to look at.
In Pennsylvania, Governor Wolf was engaged early in the process and identified the model as one of his priorities.





