I would suggest that Roukema-Kassebaum-Kennedy is that modest step. It is that first step that is going to help tens of millions of Americans keep their health insurance when they switch their jobs, regardless of preexisting health conditions. The Republicans, though, in this House are proposing a health insurance reform that is not as strong as Roukema-Kassebaum-Kennedy. They are adding on what I believe to be special interest amendments and paybacks that are going to sabotage the first real attempt we had to be able to do a bipartisan step in the right direction for the working people of this country. Now, we are talking about two editions, that in one instance the CBO is saying that the bill's profraud loopholes are going to cost $400 million. Less revenue coming in, and enforcement of fraud is going to suffer. Why should we want to do this? The MSA proposal is not going to fly in the Senate, it is not going to fly with the President.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing health care reform and the Roukema-Kassebaum-Kennedy proposal.
Share
More from Ron Klink
I always find it very interesting, the names of the bills that come before us during this Congress. I would venture, if we did not have the kind of protections we have in speech on the floor of the House, that we would be able to sue our…
Mr. Speaker, you are right, the House should not consider IMF funding just an hour before we all get on board planes to head toward home. We should have a full debate on this issue. Let me just give my colleagues one example of why we…
I think this bill is a solution in search of a problem. In 1995, the Commerce Committee developed and Congress approved, over a Presidential veto, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, which put strict limits on Federal investor…
I find myself here in the Chamber transfixed and moved by the statements of all of my colleagues today, and very proud that I have an opportunity to pay tribute to our two fallen friends. In my previous career as a journalist, I was so…





