I think this bill is a solution in search of a problem. In 1995, the Commerce Committee developed and Congress approved, over a Presidential veto, the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act, which put strict limits on Federal investor class action lawsuits. I opposed that legislation because I was concerned about preventing defrauded investors from being made whole again. But my side lost, and we all moved on. One of the arguments when we debated the 1995 act was that truly victimized investors could still seek redress in State court. So there was some comfort in that; retirees who lost their life savings to securities fraud could still pursue legal action. Now, however, I fear that Congress is moving to cut off the State avenue for class action securities suits. That could mean that investors would have no ability to seek relief from securities wrongdoers, and that is unacceptable to me. There appears to be no explosion of State securities class actions, so I see no real need for this bill.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a bill that would limit state-level class action lawsuits for securities fraud.
Share
More from Ron Klink
I will tell my colleagues, use our region of the country as an example. Back in the days when the steel industry was booming and the railroads were strong and the manufacturing section was strong, these credit unions were begun for the…
I think that we all know, or should all know, that if it was not for excess Social Security taxes from the hard-earned paychecks of Americans, there would be no surplus. We can play semantical games with the term ``trust fund,'' but if it…
Mr. Chairman, I rise really in support of the Tauzin amendment. If we go back to 1984, at that point the marketplace opened up. If we wanted to go pre-1984 and say we really need to take a fresh look, then perhaps this bill, as written…
But there has been a rumbling on the floor during this last week that somehow Members are being told that they are voting against their veterans in order to get bridges and highways. And that is not the intentions of Members on either side…





