back in 1995 the Committee on Commerce developed and this Congress passed and approved over a presidential veto the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act which put strict limits on Federal investor class action lawsuits. At the time we were being told by our friends who argued in favor of that that these victims would still have State redress. They could go to the State courts. Well, here we go again. From on high in Washington, D.C., dictating back to the States, ``You can't do this.'' I did not dream that my Republican colleagues would ever want to start telling the State courts what they could and could not do. My question is, what next do we tell them? That you cannot hear tobacco suits? That you cannot hear real estate suits? This comes at a time when an increased number of unsophisticated investors are getting into the stock market. An increased number of unsophisticated investors are getting into all marketplaces. We fear that these unsophisticated investors, many of them our constituents, might be victimized and not have redress at the Federal level and now being told by this Congress they would not have redress at the State level. Now, there appears to be no explosion of State securities class actions. I do not see any need for this bill. I would point to last year when there were only 44 cases throughout this entire Nation, the lowest number in 5 years.…
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act and its impact on state courts.
Share
More from Ron Klink
For those who may not have been here back in 1993 when we were negotiating with each other as to whether or not we should pass the NAFTA agreement which was negotiated under fast track authority, I would remind my colleagues that in that…
we have not seen the specific language. That is my problem. I understand those things are in there. We have not had a chance to debate them.
let's face it. It's screw labor week! My colleagues on the other side of the aisle have decided that they know better than the entire Supreme Court in this instance. We're not talking about a 5 to 4 decision here, or 6 to 3. Noooo. My…
I always find it very interesting, the names of the bills that come before us during this Congress. I would venture, if we did not have the kind of protections we have in speech on the floor of the House, that we would be able to sue our…





