I appreciate that, and I want to salute you and your team on the great success you have had in providing better taxpayer service this year.

Making it easier to file was a key component, for example, of the bipartisan tax reform proposal that I wrote with Senator Dan Coats.

we said we were going to come up with a tax code that was technology-neutral, so as to be market-oriented and be a system that would reward those out there who would reduce carbon emissions.

we want to make sure that we can have the elements of those energy products, the content of them, made in America.

guardianship is often used as a blunt legal tool

guardianship is often used as a blunt legal tool

I think that you are right that every single worker in the United States of America should have the right to bargain collectively, to organize for fair wages and benefits.

guardianship is often used as a blunt legal tool

Well, look, you go to just March of this year, administrative law judge issued a 218-page decision finding, 'egregious and widespread misconduct, demonstrating a general disregard for the employees' fundamental rights.'

I want to welcome the workers in this room who have had to do so much--expend so much effort over many years to have the right to organize and bargain collectively, so we stand with you in that effort.

Do you support the provision that allows a company to hire union busting firms and conduct other activity that interferes with the rights of workers to organize?

I am grateful for the work of Ranking Member Braun and the legislation we have introduced together.

Too often in our Country, workers don't have that right. I represent a state where workers over generations marched and mobilized and literally bled and died for the right to organize.

Too often in our Country, workers don't have that right. I represent a state where workers over generations marched and mobilized and literally bled and died for the right to organize.

Do you believe that workers have should have the basic dignity at work not to be surveilled by their employers?

Guess what? Under current law, Federal law, Internal Revenue Service law, Starbucks is able to write off those costs as a run of the mill business expense.

I want to welcome the workers in this room who have had to do so much--expend so much effort over many years to have the right to organize and bargain collectively, so we stand with you in that effort.

Do you support the provision that allows a company to hire union busting firms and conduct other activity that interferes with the rights of workers to organize?

I think that you are right that every single worker in the United States of America should have the right to bargain collectively, to organize for fair wages and benefits.

Well, look, you go to just March of this year, administrative law judge issued a 218-page decision finding, 'egregious and widespread misconduct, demonstrating a general disregard for the employees' fundamental rights.'

Do you believe that workers have should have the basic dignity at work not to be surveilled by their employers?

Guess what? Under current law, Federal law, Internal Revenue Service law, Starbucks is able to write off those costs as a run of the mill business expense.

I think that you are right that every single worker in the United States of America should have the right to bargain collectively, to organize for fair wages and benefits.

Do you believe that workers have should have the basic dignity at work not to be surveilled by their employers?

Guess what? Under current law, Federal law, Internal Revenue Service law, Starbucks is able to write off those costs as a run of the mill business expense, meaning taxpayers, taxpayers are subsidizing union busting in the United States of…