I thank you for your leadership over so many years on these issues.

The New START agreement does not restrict our ability to develop and deploy prompt conventional strike capabilities that could attack targets anywhere on the globe in an hour or less.

Mr. Myers, I just want to make sure you can wrap up soon, because----

The treaty will not constrain the United States from deploying the most effective missile defenses possible, nor impose additional costs or barriers on these defenses.

The New START Treaty does not inhibit any of these plans or programs.

the goal--or one of the main goals is to increase confidence that both parties are complying with the treaty.

It imposes no limits on further development of missile defenses.

I'm tempted, at this moment, to yield my time, but I'm not allowed to, by the committee rules.

Transparency leads to predictability and predictability leads to stability.

The treaty does not compromise the nuclear force levels we need to protect ourselves and our allies.

With the classical notion of deterrence, there are consequences before which an aggressor would recoil. In the world of suicide bombers, that calculation does not compute in any comparable way.

unique identifiers, just for people listening, to put it into more common language, what's the best way to express that?

The treaty does not infringe on the flexibility we need to maintain our forces, including bombers, submarines, and missiles, in a way that best serves our national security interests.

I found that people, whether they were mostly in the context of teachers and administrators, but others as well--I found that whenever the topic came up, people were even-tempered. They were always mad.

I rise today to talk about the business we have in front of us here in the Senate, financial regulatory reform. But I did want to note that we meet in an hour of real economic trauma for many families across America and across the…

We can do that with the collective energies of all the States.

We want to thank our witnesses for your testimony and your work and your scholarship.

I have thought about for a long time is, how do teachers during the school year get an accurate assessment of each of their students.

It is important that we have hearings, like this and others, to change policy and to try to do our best to be responsive to this tragedy.

What should the U.S. Senate do, and the Administration do, in the next 6 months, to make sure that this kind of tragedy does not happen or we substantially reduce the likelihood that something like this would happen again?

If it means changing policy, we need to do that. If it means amending or adjusting, we've got to do that.

Those who say, 'Oh, gee, laws don't work,' that's not true.

Today in America and worldwide, every 5 seconds a child dies from starvation. Every 5 seconds across the world, every 5 seconds every day is the reality that stares us in the face. While the United States has historically played an…

I rise today to mark the 40th anniversary of Earth Day. Started in 1970 by Wisconsin's Senator Gaylord Nelson as an environmental teach-in, Earth Day has become a global event. More than 20 million people participated in the first Earth…

I'd like to thank Chairman Harkin and Senators Murkowski, Brown, Casey, and Bennet for their leadership on efforts to improve the nutritional content of school meals provided by the Federal school lunch program.