I support the President's commitment to vetoing any bill that locks in sequestration, because to do otherwise would be both unsafe and wasteful.

I strongly support the President in requesting a defense budget above the artificial caps of the Budget Control Act.

The reason for that was a political failure on the part of their government to keep the promise that had been made to the country to keep it a multisectarian state.

We need a safe, secure, and reliable nuclear deterrent. The submarine force is a key leg of the triad.

But--and I want to be clear about this--under sequestration, which is set to return in 211 days, our Nation will be less secure.

Sequester is purely the fallout of political gridlock.

We need your help with both.

I strongly support the President in requesting a defense budget above the artificial caps of the Budget Control Act.

I support the President's commitment to vetoing any bill that locks in sequestration, because to do otherwise would be both unsafe and wasteful.

It is a national priority, and it ought to be funded out of the defense budget.

It is unfair to the servicemember to make them have to worry about how our government is organized.

Nuclear weapons don't actually cost that much.