The best answer that a group of senators... can come up with is to put some sunlight on the court.
Arlen Specter
The Public Record
Arlen Specter was a prominent American politician who served as a U.S. Senator from Pennsylvania for 30 years, from 1981 to 2011. Originally a member of the Republican Party, he switched to the Democratic Party in 2009. During his tenure, Specter was known for his moderate positions and played a key role in various significant legislative efforts, including judicial nominations and health care reform. He was involved in high-profile hearings, including those related to the 9/11 attacks and the confirmation of Supreme Court justices.
Judicial independence is the ball work of this republic. Judicial independence gives us the rule of law and it is our most highly prized value.
As Senator Schumer said yesterday, we are looking for somebody who can moderate the court and a little humor would do a lot of good.
I have concern for separation of powers which is a foundation of the constitution.
If you engage in fact finding, if the court does that, the court is transgressing into the Congressional area.
If something arises that disrupts the mission, it doesn't matter what it is, it could disrupt the mission.
the standing issue itself is of some real importance, and it's of some real importance because it goes to the question, who does have standing to--to challenge surveillance policies
somebody that shows disregard of that nature to a Federal law, a law set by this body, is not acting in conjunction or in honoring the rule of law
that concurring opinion goes into great detail as to why stare decisis ought not to be followed.
I was really glad to hear you say in response to Senator Kohl's questions that you favor television the Supreme Court.
I believe that I can finish in less than the 20 minutes and yield back some time.
since hearing this morning about the passing of Senator Byrd--he died shortly after 5 a.m.--I have been reflecting on the man I knew. Those who have the great privilege to serve in the Senate have occasion to meet and interact with great…
this raises the issue about deciding these cases where the workload is not very high, where there is a recess of some 3 months, extensive travels, and extensive lectures. Now they may do what they please, and they will, but there is a…
I don't have time to go into it now, with the limited time available, but the reader of the Congressional Record can see how frequently the Court has denied access to even the audio. It is a matter of general knowledge that the Supreme…
When the Senate ceases to engage nominees in meaningful discussion of legal issues, the confirmation process takes on an air of vacuity . . . and the Senate becomes incapable of either properly evaluating nominees or appropriately…
There is insufficient time to go over them now, but most of them are 5-4 decisions. The Supreme Court decides everything from life to death, Roe vs. Wade to the death penalty cases and double jeopardy. These cases involve the integration…
I have sought recognition to again alert my colleagues to what I consider to be a very important matter, and that is that the Supreme Court of the United States is materially changing the traditional separation of powers and that, as a…
a good bit of the substance of the questions which I have been directing toward Solicitor General Kagan involves the question as to whether she would have voted to grant cert. I believe that is an appropriate question, whether she would…
I voted for the Sanders amendment on tax incentives for oil and natural gas production to H.R. 4213, the Tax Extenders Act. Pennsylvania is in the midst of a historic boom in natural gas production from the Marcellus Shale formation. This…
I have sought recognition today to introduce The Gynecological Cancer Education and Awareness Act of 2010 also known as Johanna's Law. Every year, over 80,000 women in the United States are newly diagnosed with some form of gynecologic…





