I believe the decision is between protecting privacy and promoting commerce, and I think we ought to be able to figure out how to do both.
The question is: Should we err on the side of privacy, or should we err on the side of commerce?
I am just saying in terms of effectuating the protection of privacy, how are we going to do that?
I know it is our role to be concerned about the ultimate privacy protection that individuals deserve.
So what is the difference of having an opt-in or an opt-out? It defeats your whole argument.
I am going to give you consent, Netflix, to share my movies.
The point is you got to still make the choice with your privacy, and I think there is a legitimate concern...
I really do not see a big difference from granting permission one click at a time to a blanket consent.
But the point is I have to, under the ethics law, fill out forms at the end of every year, and I have to get that.
I think there is lost revenue because if, in fact, a mutual fund is going to invest in a company that does commodity trading and does not do...
Is the purpose for setting up an offshore commodities trading firm to avoid taxes?