On the recordJuly 30, 1997
That is the intention of the committee in including the provision, and the administration will be apprised that this is the appropriate interpretation of this provision.
Source
govinfo.govJames T. Callahan: “That is the intention of the committee in including the provision, and the administration will be apprised that this is…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the committee's interpretation of a provision in legislation.
Share
More from James T. Callahan
Jun 20, 2001
first of all, I do not know of anyone on either side of the aisle who is opposed to helping California get out of this serious problem they are in, or any of the other Western States as well. We recognize fully that there is a crisis in…
Jun 27, 2001
Mr. Chairman, I cannot believe amendments like this. It is the height of irresponsibility. I think Members should oppose this amendment because it establishes a horribly irresponsible precedent for our energy security in this country. The…
Jun 28, 2001
No, that is not why we are here. This has nothing to do with the drilling. It has to do with the fact that there is not going to be any natural gas and if there is not going to be, why build a pipeline. That is why we are here. It has only…
Apr 4, 2001
My question is, to facilitate these multibillionaires who are against this bill, Mr. Speaker, I want an opportunity to offer an amendment which limits the reductions in this tax to the first billion dollars. I think that this will satisfy…
Other voices in this conversation
