It might surprise you that it slowed down some in the Senate, even though it was unanimous in the House.

we will keep pressing until we get this done, because we feel it is exceptionally important

I would say when we hear 'major, comprehensive way,' we typically hear outside contractor coming in, charging us a fortune for their consulting services and doing a few things.

I have long believed that IRS regulations should be held to the same rigorous standards as other agencies.

We will continue to be able to follow up on that in the days ahead as well.

So in previous dialogues that I have had with IRS leadership before, there is always the carrot and the stick conversation.

That would be helpful because, obviously, we need to be able to look at how we are going to allocate the funding.

The policies articulated in the President's budget will foster economic growth, set our country on a sound fiscal path in the long term, and carry out the administration's commitment to protect the national security of the United States.

It is a big concern for me, and that is the charitable giving side.

Being the Commissioner of the IRS is an incredibly difficult task.

I think that we have come back and always focused on the most pressing issues.

This 5-year plan that is being discussed that the Secretary just mentioned--in the next 90 days, we will get some kind of update on that.

the encouragement is, get the training, get the certification. Then you can help people actually get a faster return.

Tell me what has changed in the exempt organization's portion of the IRS.

I do not want to have to wait 3 years to be able to get the last year's information.

Well, clearly that is something that Senator Coons and I do not handle here from our appropriations, but obviously, the Finance Committee does.

Thank you very much for your statement and your preparation and the ongoing work there in that role.

Thank you again for your testimony today and for your participation and for the engagement on this issue and wearing two hats.

The Judgment Fund has been an issue for awhile, just in basic transparency.

They're wanting to be able to get it moving. That makes complete sense, and I get that.

Dealing with transparency issues for the edge providers, for the content providers, do you have what you need, as far as regulatory authority?

I think the best thing we can probably do is model that, rather than legislate that.

Is there a need to be able to extend that out and say, 'If we run out of time...'

So, do you think there is enough time for them to be able to do that?

We are not the health experts when it comes to these issues. We have consulted of course with the Federal Food and Drug Administration and with others who are responsible for determining what those standards should be. And we are confident…