We will have to continue to use fossil fuels as a major part of our energy supply in a way that satisfies everyone.

But every time we have agreed it has been very successful.

The FAST Act is a good example. We did the FAST Act primarily because of that permitting reform.

Let me just make an observation here that I don't think anyone has made yet, and it has to do with fossil fuels.

I would like to have you elaborate on your feelings how successful this could be.

I have 7 requests for committees to meet during today's session of the Senate. They have the approval of the Majority and Minority leaders. Pursuant to rule XXVI, paragraph 5(a), of the Standing Rules of the Senate, the following…

And 25 years ago, we made a decision that 50/50 was arbitrary and we were going to figure out some way to be more sophisticated.

I would be interested, for the record, in any of the rest of you who have ideas.

We have a President who is against fossil fuels, coal, oil, and gas, and yet that is accountable for 80 percent of the energy it takes to run this machine called America.

You know, General Levy, I can remember back 25 years ago when we were talking about the organic capabilities that we had to have and the reason for it.

It is kind of rewarding actually, as during the last Administration, when we had a partnership program take place with Fish and Wildlife, they found the States actually were doing a better job.

The Obama administration upended the consensus based model for setting environmental regulations.