Basically, the headline is ``NIH Scientist Says He's Paid To Do Nothing; Agency Denies Administrator's `Surreal Situation' Of Collecting $100,000 Salary For No Work.'' The story goes on. I remember reading it, and I thought, whoa, somebody is not paying attention. Please don't get me wrong. I know NIH does a lot of great work and I am supportive of that. But right now we have to live within a budget. If the committee wanted to--the committee has $127 billion in discretionary spending--they could have given NIH more money. They had control over that $127 billion. They could have shifted it around to where NIH would get more. What the committee elected to do was: We will short fund NIH and we will give a lot more money for a lot of other things, and then we will try to run the gamut because we know NIH has a lot of support. I think the committee needs to go back and say: Wait a minute, the budget is $127 billion. It happens to be the largest budget of any that we have before any committee, with the exception of Defense.
Don Nickles: “Basically, the headline is ``NIH Scientist Says He's Paid To Do Nothing; Agency Denies Administrator's `Surreal…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing budget allocations for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) during a floor speech.
Share
More from Don Nickles
Yesterday the Senate completed action of the second of 13 appropriations bills for fiscal year 2005, the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill. Although the Senate has not yet adopted a new concurrent resolution on the…
I thank our colleagues for the vote on the last amendment. I especially thank my colleague and friend, Senator Conrad, for his eloquent debate on it, as well as for his support and cosponsorship of the amendment. I think it is a good…
I understand the Senator didn't like my first question because she is trying to give the Guard and Reserve additional compensation and additional pay but through a tax credit which goes to their employer which may take some time to get…
I will make a few comments concerning the Baucus amendment requesting $2.65 billion of drought assistance. I have two or three comments. One, it doesn't belong on this bill. This is the Homeland Security bill. This is not an agriculture…





