Yesterday the Senate completed action of the second of 13 appropriations bills for fiscal year 2005, the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill. Although the Senate has not yet adopted a new concurrent resolution on the budget, we did establish a discretionary spending allocation for the Appropriations Committee in the recently enacted Department of Defense appropriations bill. That allocation, and the subcommittee allocations that were derived from it, enabled us to consider the Homeland appropriations bill under the usual budget enforcement protections. During debate on the Homeland appropriations bill, a total of 10 budget points of order were raised against amendments that sought to increase spending by an incredible $19.9 billion in 2005 alone. If those amendments had been enacted and incorporated into the discretionary spending baseline, their 10-year cost is a staggering $220.2 billion. Including debt service costs, that number increases to $285.3 billion. I am happy to inform my colleagues that the Senate upheld all 10 budget points of order and rejected each one of these spending increases. Unfortunately, the Senate did adopt an amendment providing $2.98 billion in emergency spending for agriculture disaster assistance. I opposed that amendment because it did not belong on this appropriations bill, and it should be paid for and not add to the deficit.
Don Nickles: “Yesterday the Senate completed action of the second of 13 appropriations bills for fiscal year 2005, the Department of…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Senate's actions on the Department of Homeland Security appropriations bill.
Share
More from Don Nickles
If we are going to do it, we should not do it through the Tax Code. I believe it should be done through the Armed Services Committee. I have great respect for Chairman Warner and Senator Levin. Let them have hearings on it. Let them decide…
Lowering the threshold required for cloture, in my opinion, would be a mistake, because that is a threshold that almost by definition requires bipartisan involvement.
If somebody is activated and they go to Afghanistan or Iraq, don't they receive full health care costs without paying the 28 percent?
I would have to look at the figures. The baseline scored by OMB was 521. The baseline scored by CBO was 477. The figure we had before us in the budget resolution, I would want to check. CBO is in the process of revising that. We use CBO…





