Secretary Powell's address today reiterated that Saddam Hussein is an evil dictator, but he did not explain how a preemptive war is in the best interests of the American people. Will a preemptive attack on Iraq without United Nations support make America safer? How will attacking Iraq prevent the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction? What will preemptive war do to stability in the Middle East? Are we ready to commit to a decade of American troops policing Iraq and the billions of dollars needed to rebuild and stabilize that country? Before we start a war that could kill thousands of civilians, could create hundreds of new al Qaeda recruits, could increase the potential of blow-back aimed at innocent American citizens, we must think through the consequences of our actions and be prepared for a long, difficult road in Iraq. One thing is certain: Any action against Iraq will be much more difficult, much more costly, much more dangerous if we take preemptive action against Iraq without the support of the United Nations Security Council.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the implications of a potential preemptive war in Iraq.
Share
More from Sherrod Brown
All across Ohio, I hear from small business owners, farmers, and hardworking families who are getting crushed by reckless tariffs that Jon Husted supports.
more and more I am troubled by a simple question: Will Donald Trump be the last President ever elected by a free and fair election? That certainly seems to be the plan. In 2024, Donald Trump said: Get out and vote, just this time. You…
The NRCS currently includes composting facilities as a conservation practice standard, but assistance under this standard is limited to the construction of a structure to facilitate composting. This amendment proposes specifically to…
I didn’t plan to run for office again, but when I see what’s going on, I know I can do something about it for Ohio.





