I want to add my voice of support for the modification. We are all very wary of having Congress intervene in the middle of the adjudicatory action by the FCC. I think all Members are aware that there is a great deal of money available in the disposition of this matter. What I like so much about the modification, Mr. President, is simply this: It leaves the FCC free to pick an option that raises the most money for the Treasury. It puts this Congress in a position of not trying to dictate an option that may be less advantageous for the taxpayers. It makes it clear that the FCC retains some power to pick the best option for the taxpayers--one that will bring in the most revenue to the United States. Frankly, it seems to me that the modification represents the appropriate position both for the FCC and for this Congress. We should not be in the business of precluding the options of the FCC while they are adjudicating a matter. I commend the Senator from Arizona for his modification. I believe it settles this question in terms of this Chamber and that the measure has unanimous support.
Editor's note · Context
Expressing support for a modification regarding FCC adjudicatory actions and revenue generation.
Share
More from Sherrod Brown
It’s heartbreaking to think that all this time these products could have been harmful and it’s enraging that now we have so much evidence that we need to take action and it’s not happening.
The SAVE Act is yet another Republican attack on women. This bill would make registering to vote extremely difficult for millions of women who have changed their name, including over 2 million Ohioans.
By any measure, this is the worst vote he’s cast in the Senate, but it’s a continuum of his running for special interests his whole career.
The NRCS currently includes composting facilities as a conservation practice standard, but assistance under this standard is limited to the construction of a structure to facilitate composting. This amendment proposes specifically to…





