some health plans systematically obstruct, delay and deny care. That is a fact. Earlier this year, Republicans and Democrats negotiated a bill that contains the minimum protections necessary to get health insurance back on track. Ganske-Dingell reminds HMOs that they are being paid to provide coverage, not excuses. And it contains a right to sue with enough teeth in it to deter health plans from cheating their enrollees, and enough definition to preclude frivolous lawsuits. Recourse in the courts is essential. If we tell HMOs that they are accountable, we must hold them accountable. Unfortunately, the Fletcher bill compromises away the two most important patient protections, leaving HMOs thrilled and consumers no better off. It provides a right to sue that cannot actually be exercised and a right to an external appeals process that simply cannot be trusted. We need to enact legislation that does not just sound like it protects patients but actually does protect patients. Ganske-Dingell fits that bill. I ask for House support.
On the recordJuly 31, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing patient protections in health care legislation.
Share
More from Sherrod Brown
Feb 5, 2025
I thank Congressman Ivey for organizing this Special Order hour. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of more than 9,000 Federal workers in my district and their dedicated colleagues across the country. Make no mistake, Mr. Speaker. President…
Feb 10, 2025
It’s heartbreaking to think that all this time these products could have been harmful and it’s enraging that now we have so much evidence that we need to take action and it’s not happening.
Apr 10, 2025
The SAVE Act is yet another Republican attack on women. This bill would make registering to vote extremely difficult for millions of women who have changed their name, including over 2 million Ohioans.





