I find the idea that someone could come in and buy our vote here to be totally repugnant. This discredits our labors and only further undermines and demeans this institution. But I recognize that in the world of politics sometimes what is fact is not the same as what people believe. It is the fancy that comes along with some of the perceptions, and that is what we have to deal with here. We have to deal with perceptions because our system runs on perceptions, and faith in our system also runs on perceptions. I think we do have to admit that the perception out there is that confidence in Government is not as justified as it used to be. There are more questions about how we do things, which range from maybe a healthy cynicism, to an overall questioning, to downright hostility at some of the things that people read about in the papers.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing perceptions of government and the integrity of votes during a debate.
Share
More from John Glenn
I want to back up his views on this. We worked together a long, long time on nonproliferation matters, and we have over 148 nations now signed up around the world on the nonproliferation regime. It has not been perfect, but it has been…
Mr. President, this is obviously a very emotional issue with a lot of people, and we come to this debate with a lot of people having feelings that go back many years and with friends left behind in Vietnam. It brings back recollections of…
Fine, Mr. President. We will do this as rapidly as we possibly can. What we have is the buyout bill that has been back and forth between the House and Senate a number of times. I could go back and recount the dates and when we passed it…
I rise today to comment on a subject that I have followed closely during my years of service with the Senate Armed Services Committee--the modernization of the KC-135 tanker fleet used by all of our services. Mr. President, the successes…





