I oppose Senator Wallop's amendment for several reasons. First, current law requires the IRS to consider the impact that their interpretative rules will have on small businesses. Congress has, in the past, carefully considered and rejected the application of the Act to interpretative IRS regulations. It should do so again.
John Glenn: “I oppose Senator Wallop's amendment for several reasons. First, current law requires the IRS to consider the impact that…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment to the Regulatory Flexibility Act during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from John Glenn
I am not looking for any excuse at all. I am the last guy in the world here who is going to have an excuse for anything like regulatory reform. But I want to do it right. I do not want to do it here on a bill it should not be on to begin…
The buyout bill, which is the basic bill we are talking about here, is very important. It has a great deal of urgency. We are beginning to run out of our available time window on this legislation as far as having it do any good and do what…
I rise today to speak on behalf of the nomination of M. Larry Lawrence to be U.S. Ambassador to Switzerland. I have known Larry Lawrence for over a decade. I know him to be an individual of personal integrity and I respect him for his…
You want to keep them guessing as to what the response may be if they do something dumb and attack us.





