I oppose Senator Wallop's amendment for several reasons. First, current law requires the IRS to consider the impact that their interpretative rules will have on small businesses. Congress has, in the past, carefully considered and rejected the application of the Act to interpretative IRS regulations. It should do so again.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment to the Regulatory Flexibility Act during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from John Glenn
I rise today to speak on behalf of the nomination of M. Larry Lawrence to be U.S. Ambassador to Switzerland. I have known Larry Lawrence for over a decade. I know him to be an individual of personal integrity and I respect him for his…
I want to back up his views on this. We worked together a long, long time on nonproliferation matters, and we have over 148 nations now signed up around the world on the nonproliferation regime. It has not been perfect, but it has been…
I find the idea that someone could come in and buy our vote here to be totally repugnant. This discredits our labors and only further undermines and demeans this institution. But I recognize that in the world of politics sometimes what is…
The buyout bill, which is the basic bill we are talking about here, is very important. It has a great deal of urgency. We are beginning to run out of our available time window on this legislation as far as having it do any good and do what…





