I oppose Senator Wallop's amendment for several reasons. First, current law requires the IRS to consider the impact that their interpretative rules will have on small businesses. Congress has, in the past, carefully considered and rejected the application of the Act to interpretative IRS regulations. It should do so again.
John Glenn: “I oppose Senator Wallop's amendment for several reasons. First, current law requires the IRS to consider the impact that…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment to the Regulatory Flexibility Act during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from John Glenn
I've been concerned about this for a long time, about what might happen if al Qaeda, or other sympathetic groups, came into power in Pakistan.
The biggest danger to me, I think, that we face right now in this whole field is loose fissile material.
I am concerned in Iran that maybe their control of fissile material might be weak enough that some of the al Qaeda sympathetic people in Iran might be able to get fissile material.
Only one final remark. I talked about the number of regulations that could come out this year. I am sure the Senator from Wyoming is aware it takes a year or two for regulations to come out after laws are passed. The regulations coming out…





