and my colleagues, the foundation of the Clinton health care plan is a requirement that employers shall pay 80 percent of the cost of health care coverage for their employees. It is estimated by a number of different organizations that this would cost 3 million Americans their jobs. So as congressional committees begin to look at various health care proposals, including the Clinton plan, they are having their doubts about the employer mandate. So what they are doing is they are beginning to look at smaller mandates. ``Let us just require employers to pay part of it, less than 80 percent; let us begin to give subsidies to small employers,'' they say. It is the classic strategy of getting the camel's nose under the tent before we stick them with a big bill later on. We need to fix the current system, we need to help the working poor get affordable health care insurance, but not at the cost of losing their job. Let us oppose employer mandates; let us fix the current system and let us do for the American people what they want, health care, affordable for each and every American.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the employer mandate in the Clinton health care plan during a House floor debate.
Share
More from John Boehner
The deal that we have out there in my view from what I know thus far is unacceptable.
My colleagues, the people's House is only as good as its people, and I would like to take a moment to recognize a very well- respected member of our staff. Tim Harroun, the manager of the Republican cloakroom, is retiring after 41 years of…
Trump incited that bloody insurrection for nothing more than selfish reasons, perpetuated by the BS he`d been shoveling since he lost a fair election the previous November.
We need to acknowledge that what Washington sometimes calls 'tax cuts' are really just poorly disguised spending programs that expand the role of Government in lives of individuals and employers.





