Many Members in this Chamber believe that this resolution covers all of the funding for committees when, in fact, that is not the case, not even close. Looking at the chart next to me, the total amount of funding for committees is not the $52 million that we will debate today but it is almost $130 million. Only 41 percent of the amount that is spent on committees is actually covered by the Committee Funding Resolution. That is referred to as investigative committee, where the majority controls some 80 percent of those investigative staffers while the minority controls roughly 20 percent of those staffers. So I bring to the attention of my colleagues that we have some problems, and I would like to point those out during the remainder of my time. The first is that I think it is time to change the funding process. If we are going to have a committee funding process, we ought to have all of the funds for all of the committees dealt with in this committee funding resolution, not just the 41 percent that we are going to debate today.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the Committee Funding Resolution and its inadequacies during House floor debate.
Share
More from John Boehner
For a bill that was supposed to be about jobs, jobs, jobs, has turned into a bill that`s all about spending, spending, and spending.
My colleagues, the people's House is only as good as its people, and I would like to take a moment to recognize a very well- respected member of our staff. Tim Harroun, the manager of the Republican cloakroom, is retiring after 41 years of…
If we had somehow been able to do that deal, we would not be having to negotiate this situation now with $20 trillion in debt.
There is nothing more dangerous than a reckless expletive deleted, who thinks he is smarter than everyone else? Ladies and gentlemen, meet Senator Ted Cruz.





