Political Quotes

On the recordFebruary 2, 1994
this manikin standing next to me is not a NASA project. It is a suit that farmers must wear in the hot growing season when applying pesticides. The EPA doesn't know the cost of this, because they didn't have to do a cost-benefit analysis. The USDA estimates it will cost $500 million for farmers to meet the regulations here. The standard is impossible for the States to regulate. It is another unfunded mandate on the States. It shows no benefits in the health of workers. It is time for Congress to stop heaping additional mandates on the States without consideration of the cost of these regulations. It is time for Congress to stop issuing regulations on businesses and on farmers without risk-benefit analysis. If we had done a risk-benefit analysis by the EPA on this project, the EPA would have found out that the farmers who use these suits would have been dead long before they would have ever had any risk of pesticide abuse to their health, because they would suffocate to death, having to wear these in the hot growing season. It is time to defeat the rule and require EPA to do risk-benefit and cost-benefit analysis before they issue regulations.
Said by
John Boehner
Ohio

Editor's note · Context

Boehner criticizes EPA regulations affecting farmers and calls for risk-benefit analysis before issuing mandates.

Share

More from John Boehner

Sep 22, 2015

There is one thing we know about this Pope, he's not afraid to take on the status quo or not afraid to say what he really thinks.

transcripts.cnn.com
Apr 11, 2021

This bill is the greatest threat to freedom that I have seen in the 19 years I have been here in Washington.

msnbc.com
Jun 12, 2015

I have a motion at the desk. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the motion. The Clerk read as follows: Mr. Boehner moves that the House reconsider the vote on the question of concurring in the matter comprising the remainder of…

govinfo.gov
Oct 21, 2015

What is to be gained by having yet another committee after all the other committees we've had investigate? What is to be gained by this? This is a bad idea.

congress.gov

Other voices in this conversation