Here's the takeaway: Nine days after the IRS knows they're in trouble, Lois Lerner is trying to cover her tracks.

We want to get to the truth as quickly as possible.

We want this to happen this month.

They had a duty to produce the documents that we actually subpoenaed.

What kind of investigation is going on when the FBI won't even talk to the head of the agency that has this kind of stuff going on with their email exchange and won't talk to the agency that lost key evidence in an investigation that's…

We're all fine with that, but there is no reason we can't run our investigation at the same time he's running his.

Lois Lerner was not trying to destroy email.

That's what just bothers every single American, Mr. Chairman.

Thirty-one days after this email happens, she goes to a Bar Association speech and blames some good public servants in Cincinnati, says that's where the problem is, lies to the American people.

They had a duty to disclose once they knew that they didn't preserve and couldn't produce.

So in the past four months.

Have you had conversations with the State Department about the Keystone pipeline?

But don't you have a critical part in the ultimate decision?

Do you know when the application for the Keystone pipeline was first submitted?

And your comments were clear back in 2011.

So they are violating the free speech of our citizens, violating their freedom of association of our citizens, violating the freedom to petition the government of our citizens, and violating I think the constitutional right against search…

Maybe it's because the White House is the same party. Right? Maybe that had--could that have anything to do with it, Mr. Koskinen?

You said, 'We're going to give them all to you.' Fine.

You promised to produce the documents; you did not. You promised to be forthcoming and candid; you were not.

The fact that Barbara Bosserman, a maxed-out contributor to the President's campaign, is running this investigation is a joke.

But that's not what happened, Mr. Koskinen. The Chief Counsel at Treasury knew about it and talked to the Chief Counsel at the White House in April, right after you found out about it.

Your agency has a set of rules for taxpayers and, apparently, another set of rules for themselves.

You would think that would be significant enough to remember how it happened.

Don't you think it's incumbent upon the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service when he gets a--think about this.

The American people deserve this agency, which was previously believed to be nonpartisan--they need to be able to trust that it will once again become nonpartisan, nonpolitical.