This is not Jim Jordan saying this. This is not Donald Trump saying this. This is not the Freedom Caucus saying this.

It is a substantial number.

I think it is clear, statute is very clear, if the State Department believes it is an effective tool, then you have got to put them on notice so they can use the tool.

Can you get us that information? That would be something we would like to know.

I do not believe any pose a national security threat for that reason.

With substantial confidence I would say no.

That is as plain as you can write it.

Hurts competition, hurts the consumer, right?

This law has been a complete failure. And the American people know it.

It seems, by definition, if 23 out of 23 fail, then you should be able to say that, of course, by definition is a complete failure.

It's just ridiculous. It's a congressional investigation, congressional inquiry. We want the information. Give it to us.

If you like your plan, keep it; like your doctor, keep it; premiums are going to go down.

And yet we have this phenomena in front of us. Sixteen of 23 have completely failed.

If all 23 fail, would that be a complete failure?

One of the things we were promised when ObamaCare passed is 20 million people will use the exchange.

And yet you just all told us ObamaCare is the greatest thing in the world.

Would it be a complete failure if every single CO-OP that you guys authorized just 2 years ago failed?

Well, all I'm hearing is about community consolidating, and you're telling me no new ones are going to be created...

Twenty-three programs were given money just 2 years ago, and 16 of them have already failed.

Anyone with a brain can see that, and now you are telling us, oh, we got to be X--we're going to be confidential with the information.

Just about everything stated about ObamaCare when it was passed has turned out to be false.

Freedom of religion is not only the right to worship in private, but it is also the right to publicly exercise our religion without fear of government interference.

This bill does not take anything away from any individual or any group because it does not modify any of our existing civil rights protections.

I think the First Amendment says, no, you don't.

I think it's a travesty, because I don't think Hillary Clinton has been treated like any other American would've been treated under the same circumstances.