If everyone, based on the little experiment you all ran where you found it was--that we're batting 1,000, anyone who applied fraudulently may, in fact, have gotten money that they weren't entitled to.

the trend lines aren't good, the pattern isn't good.

I demand a recorded vote. A recorded vote was ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--ayes 342, noes 72, not voting 19, as follows: [Roll No. 608] AYES--342 Abraham Adams Aguilar Amodei Ashford Barletta Barr Bass…

I just find this remarkable. People cheating the timecard, 415 of them, almost half of all unsupported hours that accounts for.

I offer this resolution, H. Res. 828, for consideration by the full House. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will report the resolution. The Clerk read as follows: H. Res. 828 Resolved, That John Andrew Koskinen, Commissioner of the…

For the sake of argument, let's accept what the White House said.

We can't even get someone in the Federal Government to tell us what that total number...

It's roughly equivalent to half of all discretionary spending we did in 2017.

This is from their budget. For 2017, the table shows that total offsetting collections and offsetting receipts from the public are estimated to be $534 billion.

But I want to try to get a handle on the overall picture here.

Thank you to our witnesses. And, Mr. Kohn, I agree with you.

Maybe the best way to get the information is to pass Mr. Palmer's legislation.

The established rule is that the expenditure of public funds is proper only when authorized by Congress, not that public funds may be expended unless prohibited by Congress.

I would say that is the understatement of the year.

So one other thing that is important on that, if we could but that back up, one other thing that is important is the date.

It sure looks to me like it is Secretary Clinton, as you said.

A compromise or disruption of our election process is something that this Congress certainly should be looking into.

Free and fair elections are the linchpin of our society.

This is pure political maneuvering.

This Administration's Department of Justice is actually requiring New Orleans police officers to break the law in an effort to further their political agenda.

For them to then deliberately oppress American citizens based on their religious or political views with these powers is an unconscionable act.

In a constitutional republic like the United States of America, we are fundamentally predicated on the rule of law.

The IRS targeted people for exercising their most fundamental liberty, their right to speak against the policies of their government, and they got harassed for doing that.

This is what so many Americans are frustrated about, this double standard.

It is very frustrating for me. I have learned that--I will not accept it. This all has to change.