Have you also read in the press that she and Mr. Tom Perez... visited the White House for a bill signing with the President?

The independent contractor said they were unable to adequately test the confidentiality and integrity of the system. They said no complete end-to-end testing was done. The chief information security officer recommended not launching it…

Have you two looked at the annual savings, wasteful spending that you see that you agree on?

This is wholesale suspension of law in the teeth of a clear statutory command to the contrary.

For decades, this Congress has allowed its core authority to drain away.

Taking steps to deal with the realities of implementation of a complex program hardly constitutes a failure to take care that the laws are faithfully executed.

This raises the question of what it means to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.

The decision, for example, to defer deportation of individuals who were brought to the United States as children who have not committed felonies or misdemeanors and do not pose a threat to public safety--so-called 'DREAMers'--is a classic…

The President's duty alone.

The House actually had already passed the Authority for Mandate Delay Act.

the accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive, and judiciary, in the same hands . . . may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny.

I assure you that if you are fighting this Administration, as I and many others are fighting this Administration each and every day, you will find this President is, indeed, enforcing the law.

It is upon that covenant that we should not divide by parties and we should stand firmly for the separation of powers.

What it does is it allows for these issues that divide us to be resolved unilaterally.

the established will of the majority of the Senators and the House of Representatives was to do what? To protect the DREAMers.

If a President can unilaterally change the meaning of laws in substantial ways or refuse to enforce them, it takes off line that very thing that stabilizes our system.

we could be making meaningful progress toward crafting and passing laws for the betterment of the American people.

Well, that scares us.

Who is the IT person? Who is the person in charge?

My marching orders were get the system up by October 1st, right?

they are the political people in charge. They are the ones who determined October 1st was the date they needed to move forward on.

This, to me, seems to be the billion dollar question. Why didn't you delay this?

would she come in front of this committee and testify about this disaster this rollout has been

This is part of a pattern that occurs due to failure to adhere to the private sector's world-class standards for web production.

for political reasons they had to adhere to this date, and the end is, the end result is Americans' personal information is put at risk.