I feel like asking this body to wake me up when this is all over. Wake me up when you finish choosing what kind of contraception female Federal employees ought to use. The good faith of this body, indeed the sacred vote of this body and of the Senate is at stake. I have just come to the floor to say women are not going to take tampering with their contraceptive health. Look, we agree choice is controversial in this body. But I can tell my colleagues what is not controversial in this body or among the American people, and that is choice of contraceptives. There is a reason; that is because we have got to have a choice of contraception because some of that does not work on some of us. Some of it will make us sick. Some has long-term effects. Some has short term effects. So when Members of this body go into conference and try to make the diaphragm the only contraception that is available to women, they are insulting the women, not only of the Federal Government, but of the United States of America at their core. We are fooling around with women's health when we decide as a body to choose or to limit their choice of contraception. One does not have to be a woman to know that one size does not fit all when it comes to contraception. If we want to preserve women's health, if we want to stop abortion, then the one issue that ought to unite us, pro-life and pro-choice, together is contraception.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the issue of contraception choices for female Federal employees.
Share
More from James Norton
last Congress, Republicans introduced 26 bills or amendments to change local D.C. election laws, including 14 to prohibit noncitizens from voting in D.C. or to repeal, nullify, or prohibit the carrying out of the local D.C. law that allows…
under the D.C. Home Rule Act, the President, with the advice and consent of the Senate--a chamber in which D.C. has no representation--appoints judges to the local D.C. courts. The President must make a nomination from a list of candidates…
I know what it means to be excluded from your own Constitution, and after the experience of African Americans in this country and a Civil War, I never thought I would see a civil war in law where we would try to exclude any other group of…
I support this bill. I am very pleased that this question has been settled by the commitment of the Department of Homeland Security to make its home in the District of Columbia. It is unthinkable that the Department of Homeland Security of…





