The Republican majority touts their plan for offering people choices. Why do they not begin by giving us a choice of bills? It is unthinkable that seniors would buy into a plan that thrusts them further into the managed care and HMO market that today routinely is dumping them. It is unthinkable that we would commit scarce health care dollars to the costly, countless administrative structures of HMOs instead of relying on low costs, administrative efficiency built into Medicare. It is unthinkable that we would send our seniors to a private sector HMO party that private insurers say they will boycott. It is unthinkable that we would send seniors shopping among the chaos of premiums and deductibles and copayments, out there to snare even the most sophisticated. This rule gives seniors choices they cannot take and cannot afford. It gives them every choice, except the choice they must have, a choice between a cosmetic bill and one that works.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the Republican plan for health care choices for seniors.
Share
More from James Norton
I strongly oppose this bill, which repeals the police accountability and transparency law that the District of Columbia enacted in 2023. Last year, violent crime in D.C. was down 35 percent, reaching an over 30-year low. This year, violent…
I owe the chairman and the ranking member many thanks for today's bill. I appreciate that you have worked together on it, and I appreciate that you have brought forward the only available remedy for driving down $4-a-gallon gas. Sometimes…
We write to you, in unison, as representatives of the District of Columbia's business organizations, urging you to oppose the Joint Resolution of Disapproval H.J. Res. 142 and Joint Resolution of Disapproval S.J. Res. 102 that would…
the D.C. local legislature, the Council, has 13 members. If D.C. residents do not like how members vote, residents can vote them out of office or pass a ballot measure. That is called democracy. Congress has 535 voting Members. None are…





