Let's speak of the consequences of a ``yes'' vote on the Iraq supplemental. A ``yes'' vote would keep the war going through the end of President Bush's term. It would provide money to fuel an attack on Iran. It would force the privatization of Iraqi oil. It would escalate the insurgency. A ``yes'' vote would increase the number of troop casualties in the middle of a civil war. It would increase the number of civilian casualties. It would create a demand for more troops. It would force a cutback in the agenda of many in Congress because money that could be used for schools, health care, seniors and the environment would continue to be spent for war. It would force the destabilization of the Middle East and would erode the public's confidence in Congress. It is time to end the war; to bring the troops home; to use the money that is in the pipeline to bring the troops home; to set in place a parallel process to stabilize Iraq. That is what House Resolution 1234 is about. I urge its consideration and support of Members of Congress.
Dennis Kucinich: “Let's speak of the consequences of a ``yes'' vote on the Iraq supplemental. A ``yes'' vote would keep the war going…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a vote on the Iraq supplemental funding during a House debate.
Share
More from Dennis Kucinich
As an ardent advocate of persons with all types of disabilities--physical, mental, or developmental--I strongly supported the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act that protect families and individuals affected by…
The same geniuses who involved the U.S. in a war against Libya, who knocked off the pro-U.S. Libyan Government, who created in Benghazi an extremist shooting gallery which has claimed four American lives including our Ambassador, who have…
We have to look at the implications of this. If you have European countries who are essentially part of the UNIFIL presence in south Lebanon in furtherance of a U.N. resolution to end hostilities between Hezbollah and Israel, to create…
Will seniors be pushed off the fiscal cliff? Social Security did not cause the deficit, but the White House's plan to lower Social Security cost-of-living benefits could eventually reduce seniors' annual benefits by hundreds of dollars…





