I would like to cite the latest GAO report about the NIF, which was issued on June 1, and continues to recommend an independent scientific review of NIF. It says, In our reports, we recommended that the Secretary of energy arrange for an independent outside scientific and technical review of NIF's remaining technical challenges. NIF still lacks an independent external review process. Independent external reviews are valuable for measuring cost, schedule, and technical success in any large and ambitious science project. Yet, no such external independent reviews of NIF have been conducted or planned. The DOE's own orders state that external independent reviews are beneficial; however, DOE plans to continue its own internal review program, allowing Defense Programs officials to manage the process themselves. It is very clear, Mr. Chairman, that accountability has been lacking. While we know about the lack of accountability at NIF, we also have an opportunity here to take a strong position with respect to nonproliferation and fund some of those programs that have been cut back.
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the need for independent reviews of the National Ignition Facility (NIF) during a discussion on accountability.
Share
More from Dennis Kucinich
We have to look at the implications of this. If you have European countries who are essentially part of the UNIFIL presence in south Lebanon in furtherance of a U.N. resolution to end hostilities between Hezbollah and Israel, to create…
I am disappointed to say, however, that although the chairman claims we are pursuing this investigation on a 'bipartisan basis,' that has simply not been the case.
Over 12 million Americans are unemployed while our infrastructure is falling apart. But at least the U.S. is creating some jobs--for spies. The Washington Post says the Pentagon will dramatically expand the role and size of its own…





