I support the cause of peace, I support the defense of the United States and the men and women who serve. I also support the taxpayers of the United States of America. That is why I rise in opposition to this rule, because it authorizes a $2.2 billion boondoggle called the national missile defense, NMD. The NMD will consume defense budgets, undermine legitimate military expenditures, and contribute to the erosion of the readiness of our forces. Taxpayers will regret the day we authorize $2.2 billion in wasteful spending for the NMD. Everything is wrong about spending $2.2 billion for the missile defense building in the bill. First, the technology is not feasible, it is not testable, and it would not and could not be reliable. Second, there is no real threat that such a missile defense system could protect anyone against anything. Third, it clearly violates the ABM Treaty of 1972. The concept of the ABM Treaty recognizes that countries have nuclear missiles, swords, but could not deploy shields.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the national missile defense funding during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Dennis Kucinich
I certainly hope that today's hearing is not going to be perceived as an effort to exploit a tragedy for political purposes 27 days out from an election.
So why hasn't the President directed DHS and some of those other officials that are in charge of making sure this election, 2018, which is right around the corner, that they're protected, that they're actively doing things.
We put together a bipartisan congressional coalition to try to stop the war in Libya. That four Americans, including our ambassador, were killed confirmed our worst fears: that American power was being used to open the door for jihadists…
Entitlement reform 2012. Let's see. Wealthy Americans are entitled to tax breaks. Corporations are entitled to billions in giveaways. Arms manufacturers are entitled to bigger contracts. The poor and the middle class? Well, they're…





