If my colleagues' arguments are correct, then the House of Representatives in 1835 acted unconstitutionally when it passed the resolution stating that the Treaty of France "should be maintained." But, Mr. Speaker, in fact, no court has ever found that, in 167 years, that the House acted unconstitutionally in 1835. It is, therefore, not for opponents to say that the House has no role in treaty termination today. My motion is therefore both constitutional, Mr. Speaker, and within the rules of the House. A party to a treaty is the country, not a specific President. In a democracy, a President is not sovereign. In America, the people are sovereign.
Dennis Kucinich: “If my colleagues' arguments are correct, then the House of Representatives in 1835 acted unconstitutionally when it…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the constitutional role of Congress in treaty termination.
Share
More from Dennis Kucinich
Mike Pence, I think, really helps that message a lot because he's someone who has been in Indiana.
I thank the gentlelady from California for yielding. Mr. McKEON. I continue to reserve the balance of my time.
So why hasn't the President directed DHS and some of those other officials that are in charge of making sure this election, 2018, which is right around the corner, that they're protected, that they're actively doing things.
Republicans I talked to, they don't want to run on Trump or this. In the districts that matter, in the districts that are going to make the majority, there are not -- they don't want to be talking about this. They want to talk about taxes.





