The Court’s decision is nothing less than an open invitation for the Government to bypass the Constitution.

Today, the threat is to birthright citizenship. Tomorrow, a different administration may try to seize firearms from law-abiding citizens or prevent people of certain faiths from gathering to worship.

No matter how illegal a law or policy, courts can never simply tell the executive to stop enforcing it against anyone.

Books expressing implicit support for patriotism, women’s rights, interfaith marriage, consumption of meat, immodest dress, and countless other topics may conflict with sincerely held religious beliefs.

a grave and unsupported diminution of the judicial power of equity

would be well advised to file promptly class-action suits and to request temporary injunctive relief for the putative class pending class certification.

In dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor masterfully exposed Alito’s extralegal interpretive maneuvers.

By retreating from meaningful judicial review exactly where it matters most, the Court abandons transgender children and their families to political whims.

Thus, the majority subjects a law that plainly discriminates on the basis of sex to mere rational-basis review.

This Court endorses the radical proposition that the President is harmed, irreparably, whenever he cannot do something he wants to do, even if what he wants to do is break the law.

The Government’s conduct in this litigation poses an extraordinary threat to the rule of law.

No right is safe in the new legal regime the Court creates.

We, as a Nation and a court of law, should be better than this.

I cannot join so gross an abuse of the Court’s equitable discretion.

This Court’s precedent establishes beyond a shade of doubt that the Executive Order is unconstitutional.

This is not the first time the Court closes its eyes to noncompliance, nor, I fear, will it be the last.

No right is safe in the new legal regime the Court creates.

The Court’s decision is nothing less than an open invitation for the Government to bypass the Constitution.

Few constitutional questions can be answered by resort to the text of the Constitution alone.

rewarding lawlessness

No right is safe in the new legal regime the court creates.

To get such relief, the Government would have to show that the Order is likely constitutional, an impossible task

The other shoe has dropped on executive immunity.

It is inconceivable that learning should be shackled to a moment in time.

With the stroke of a pen, the president has made a 'solemn mockery' of our Constitution.